Current focus: Lovable + Supabase + Stripe Incident desk: Mon–Fri, 9 AM–6 PM ET

Lovable Production Readiness Audit

Find launch blockers before real users do.

A fixed-scope production-readiness audit for Lovable applications that are preparing to carry — or already carry — real users, customer data or revenue.

We focus on the workflows that matter most, then return a prioritized risk register and a bounded stabilization plan.

Start a Production-Readiness Audit See the audit domains
  • Business-critical workflows first
  • Evidence-backed findings
  • No rewrite by default

Your app can be functional and still not be ready.

This audit is the right starting point when:

  • launch or a customer deadline is approaching,
  • the app has real users but no senior production owner,
  • authentication, permissions or payment state feel fragile,
  • source, account or domain ownership is unclear,
  • preview works but release and rollback are informal,
  • backups exist but restore has never been tested,
  • monitoring checks pages rather than business workflows,
  • an earlier freelancer or builder is no longer available.

We start with the workflows whose failure hurts the business.

A small application may still be business-critical. The initial scope normally names up to three workflows, such as:

  • sign in and session recovery,
  • payment to entitlement,
  • critical data write and read,
  • invitation and role management,
  • webhook processing,
  • customer email or external API delivery.

Audit domains

The audit may cover:

  • Business-critical workflow map
  • Repository, account and domain ownership
  • Architecture and external dependencies
  • Authentication and authorization
  • RLS and tenant isolation
  • Payment and entitlement integrity
  • Secrets and environment separation
  • Deployment, release and rollback
  • Logging, monitoring and alert ownership
  • Backup and restore capability
  • Critical-flow testing
  • Error handling and graceful degradation
  • Quotas, provider changes and external dependencies
  • Runbooks and operational ownership
  • Security and compliance boundaries
  • Migration and continuity exposure

What you receive

A written report you can act on — or hand to any engineer.

  • Executive summary
  • Application and business context
  • Critical-workflow map
  • System and dependency map
  • Domain-by-domain scorecard
  • Launch blockers
  • Critical / Recommended / Optional risk register
  • Evidence, confidence and limitations
  • Prioritized 30-day stabilization roadmap
  • Decision options
  • Fixed or capped follow-on sprint scope, where justified
Illustration of a prioritized risk register: findings ranked critical, recommended and optional, with the launch blockers flagged. risk register — prioritized CRITICAL Stripe webhook signature is not verified payment → entitlement · evidence attached CRITICAL Backups exist — restore has never been tested backup & restore · runbook missing RECOMMENDED Alerts go to one personal inbox monitoring · alert ownership OPTIONAL Preview data drifts from production environments · low blast radius → Prioritized 30-day stabilization roadmap These two are launch blockers — fixed first

How the audit runs

  1. Confirm the scope

    We confirm the launch and workflow scope before any payment.

  2. Establish ownership and access

    We establish ownership and the minimum access needed to review the agreed workflows.

  3. Collect evidence

    We collect architecture, configuration and operational evidence.

  4. Review each domain

    We review each agreed domain against production expectations.

  5. Normalize and QA findings

    We normalize and independently QA the findings for evidence and severity.

  6. Deliver the report

    You receive the report and a decision walkthrough.

  7. Propose bounded follow-on

    We propose only the bounded follow-on work supported by the findings.

The audit is not:

  • a full application build,
  • an open-ended feature backlog,
  • a visual redesign,
  • a guarantee that every defect will be found,
  • a formal penetration test or certification,
  • an instruction to rebuild the application by default.

Possible follow-on work

Follow-on work is not automatic. It is separately scoped, approved, tested and priced — quoted from the findings.

  • Production Stabilization Sprint
  • RLS Remediation Sprint
  • Safe Release / Production Lockdown Setup
  • Selected recovery or backup work
  • Managed Reliability after a suitable baseline

Readiness audit questions

More questions? Read the full FAQ →
Is this a code review?

Code is one evidence source, but the audit is wider than code. It examines ownership, authentication, data isolation, payments, release, monitoring, backup, rollback and operational responsibility.

Does the app need to be live?

No. It should be sufficiently complete for the agreed critical workflows and production boundaries to be reviewed.

Will you rewrite AI-generated code?

Not by default. The audit identifies what should be kept, stabilized, isolated, replaced or deferred. A rewrite is a decision, not an automatic starting point.

Is security included?

Security-relevant configuration and production risks are reviewed within the agreed scope. This is not a formal penetration test, compliance audit or certification.

What happens after the audit?

You can use the report independently. Where implementation is justified, we provide a fixed or capped sprint proposal tied directly to selected findings and acceptance criteria.

Not the right starting point?

App broken now? Start Incident Diagnosis Permissions feel uncertain? See the RLS & Data Isolation Review Planning a migration? See the Production Independence Assessment

Move from “it seems to work” to a production decision supported by evidence.

A prioritized risk register and a bounded stabilization plan, focused on the workflows that matter most.

Start a Production-Readiness Audit